Peter Rupert's Research


    Research in Progress

    Revisiting Wage, Hours, and Earnings Profiles , with Giulio Zanella    

    We re-examine wage profiles in the PSID, 1968-2007. We find that in long panels there is no evidence that wages decline over the life cycle until very late in life. Much of the literature has documented that wages fall beginning around age 55. This new evidence should rekindle interest in understanding human capital investment and depreciation over the life cycle.

    Competitive Search versus Random Matching with Bargaining: A Test of Direction and Efficiency, with Bryan Engelhardt    

    In this paper we nest the canonical competitive search model of Moen (1997) inside a stan- dard random matching model with bargaining as in Pissarides (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation is used to test for several equilibrium conditions that differentiate the two strands of the literature. The results fail to reject that workers direct their search, and to submarkets or firms with a particular level of productivity, while posting (i.e. efficiency via Hosios (1990)) is rejected in three of the six industries considered.

    Housing and the Labor Market: Time to Move and Aggregate Unemployment, with Etienne Wasmer    

    The Mortensen-Pissarides model with unemployment benefits and taxes has been able to account for the variation in unemployment rates across countries but does not explain why geographical mobility is very low in some countries (on average, three times lower in Europe than in the U.S.). We build a model in which both unemployment and mobility rates are endogenous. Our findings indicate that an increase in unemployment benefits and in taxes does not generate a strong decline in mobility and accounts for only half to two-thirds of the difference in unemployment from the US to Europe. We find that with higher commuting costs the effect of housing frictions plays a large role and can generate a substantial decline in mobility. We show that such frictions can account for the differences in unemployment and mobility between the US and Europe.

    Commuting, Wages and Bargaining Power, with Elena Stancanelli and Etienne Wasmer    

    A search model of the labor market is augmented to include commuting time to work. The theory posits that wages are positively related to commute distance, by a factor itself depending negatively on the bargaining power of workers. Since not all combinations of distance and wages are accepted, there is non-random selection of accepted job offers. We build on these ingredients to explore in the data the relationship between wages and commute time . We find that neglecting to account for this selection will bias downward the wage impact of commuting, and marginally affect the coefficients on education, age and gender. The correlation between the residuals of the selectivity equation and the distance equation is -0.70, showing the large impact of commute time on job acceptance decisions. We also use the theory to calculate the bargaining power of workers which largely varies depending on demographic groups: it appears to be much larger for men than that for women and that the bargaining power of women with oung children is essentially zero.

    Some other papers

    Theory, Measurement and Calibration of Macroeconomic Models, with Paul Gomme (Journal of Monetary Economics)

    Calibration has become a standard tool of macroeconomics. This paper extends and refines the calibration methodology along several important dimensions. First, accounting for home production is important both in measuring calibration targets and in organizing the data in a model-consistent fashion. For this reason, thinking about home production is important even if the model under consideration does not include home production. Second, investment-specific technological change is included because of its strong balanced growth parameter restrictions. Third, the measurement strategy is laid out as transparently as possible so that others can easily replicate the underlying calculations. The data and calculations used in this paper are available at http://clevelandfed.org/research/Models/rbc/Index.cfm.

    How Amenities Affect Job and Wage Choices Over the Life Cycle, with Ed Nosal (Review of Economic Dynamics)    

    Job amenities are explicitly included in a model of job choice over the life cycle. The amenities are characterized by an indivisibility--a worker must be present at a job to enjoy its amenities. This characterization has implications on initial job choice, a worker's wage profile and whether they move to a higher or lower paying job.

    General Equilbrium with Nonconvexities and Money, with Karl Shell, Guillaume Rocheteau and Randall Wright (Journal of Economic Theory, 142, 2008)    

    In general equilibrium with nonconvexities, there exist sunspot equilibria with good welfare properties, where sunspots ameliorate the nonconvexities. In these equilibria, we show agents act as if they have quasi-linear utility. We use this result to construct a new model of monetary exchange along the lines of the one by Lagos and Wright, where trade occurs in both centralized and decentralized markets, but we replace quasi-linearity with general preferences and indivisible labor. This suggests that modern monetary theory is more robust than one might have thought, and constitutes progress on the classic problem of integrating money and general equilibrium theory.

    Crime and the Labor Market: A Search Model with Optimal Contracts , with Bryan Englehardt and Guillaume Rocheteau (Journal of Public Economics, 92, 2008)    

    The Labor Market and Female Crime , with Bryan Englehardt and Guillaume Rocheteau (in Frontiers of Family Economics, Emerald Press, 2008)    

    This paper extends the Pissarides (2000) model of the labor market to include crime and punishment a la Becker (1968). The model is used to study, analytically and quantitatively, the effects of various labor market and crime policies. For instance, a more generous unemployment insurance system reduces the crime rate of the unemployed but its effect on the crime rate of the employed depends on job duration and jail sentences. When the model is calibrated to U.S. data, the overall effect on crime is positive but quantitatively small. Wage subsidies reduce unemployment and crime rates of employed and unemployed workers, and improve society's welfare. Hiring subsidies reduce unemployment but they can raise the crime rate of employed workers. Crime policies (police technology and jail sentences) affect crime rates significantly but have only negligible effects on the labor market.

    Inflation and Unemployment in General Equilbrium, with Guillaume Rocheteau and Randall Wright (Scandanavian Journal of Economics, 2007)    

    When labor is indivisible, there exist efficient outcomes where some agents are randomly unemployed (Rogerson 1988). We integrate this idea into a modern model of monetary exchange, where some trade occurs in centralized markets and some in decentralized markets, as in Lagos and Wright (2006). This delivers a general equilibrium model of unemployment and money with explicit microeconomic foundations. We show the implied relation between inflation and unemployment can be positive or negative, depending on simple preference conditions. Our Phillips Curve provides a long-run, exploitable, trade off for monetary policy; it turns out, however, that the optimal policy is the Friedman rule.

    The Decline of Manufacturing Employment in the United States, with Eric Fisher    

    The Return to Capital and the Business Cycle, with Paul Gomme and B. Ravikumar    

    We measure the return to capital directly from the NIPA data and examine the return implications of the real business cycle model. We construct a quarterly time series of the after-tax return to business capital. Its volatility is considerably smaller than that of S&P 500 returns. The standard business cycle model captures almost 50% of the volatility in the return to capital (relative to the volatility of output). We consider several departures from the benchmark model; the most promising is one with higher risk aversion which captures more than 75% of the relative volatility in the return to capital.